LNG Risk Management

Managing the risks of onshore and offshore LNG facilities via a thorough understanding of the design and key issues associated with liquefied natural gas.

Our multifaceted approach takes into consideration the needs of regulators, engineering contractors and most importantly, you. LNG terminals, send-out facilities and associated pipelines, and power plants around the world rely on our extensive experience to complete QRAs, HAZOP and hazard identification studies, safety integrity level (SIL) reviews, and consequence analysis modeling.

Learn More

Have a Question on LNG Risk Management?

Contact Us

Our Team

Georges A. Melhem, Ph.D., FAIChE

President & CEO The founder of ioMosaic and internationally renowned expert in the areas of pressure relief and flare systems design, chemical reaction systems, process safety and risk analysis. Read more...

Neil Prophet

Senior Vice President and Partner He brings over 20 years of experience in pressure relief and flare systems design project management and engineering expertise for chemical, pharmaceutical and petrochemical companies. Read more...

John Barker, Ph.D.

Director The head of our international offices in the U.K. and the Kingdom of Bahrain and an expert in risk management for oil, gas and transportation. Read more...

Peter Stickles, P.E.

Principal Consultant Senior authority with over 50 years of experience in chemical process safety, petroleum refining and petrochemical technology, and process design. Read more...

Enio Kumpinsky, Ph.D.

Principal Consultant Senior authority with over 35 years of diversified experience in process safety in the chemical manufacturing industry. Read more...

Ram Goyal

Consultant A seasoned leader in engineering project management and safety standards, specializing in Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). Read more...

Featured Resources

 

Development of Methodologies for Managing Process Safety Risk Using HAZOP and LOPA for LNG Facilities

By implementing structured PHA approaches, LNG operators can enhance safety, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency, ensuring the long-term integrity of LNG infrastructure. Read this publication for a detailed and concise guide for LNG production, storage, and transport companies to understand and consistently apply process hazard analysis methodologies, tailored to the LNG industry.

Read the Publication

Understand LNG Fire Hazards

Potential hazards resulting from intentional or accidental spilling of large quantities of LNG include thermal radiation from vapor cloud fires (also referred to as flash fires) and pool fires. There is general agreement among LNG experts regarding the following aspects of potential LNG fire and explosion hazards:

  1. Vapors from large, un-ignited spills of LNG cannot travel far into developed areas without finding an ignition source, igniting, and burning back to the source.
  2. Once delayed ignition of the vapor cloud occurs, and provided that the cloud is unconfined and rich in methane, the LNG vapors will burn in the form of a vapor cloud fire.
  3. A vapor cloud traversing over commercial and/or residential terrain will almost certainly encounter an ignition source early in its downwind drift and the resulting vapor cloud fire will burn back to the source.
  4. The vapor cloud fire will burn back to the source and cause a pool fire at the source if the release is a continuous release and the release duration is longer than the time it takes the cloud to find an ignition source.
  5. If the vapor cloud is confined and/or the vapors contain large amounts of heavier hydrocarbons (C2+), then the flame can accelerate and result in an explosion. The magnitude of the explosion and explosion damage will depend on several factors including the amount of vapors above the lower flammable limit, the presence of obstacles and degree of confinement, the composition of the vapor cloud, and the strength of the ignition source.
  6. If immediate ignition occurs, a pool fire will result. The extent of the pool spreading (diameter) and flame height will depend on several factors including the flow rate of LNG, the spill surface type (water or land), the spill surface geometry, spill surface roughness, release composition, release temperature, ambient wind speed, ambient temperature, and ambient relative humidity.
  7. If the liquid pool is unconfined and the inventory of LNG is large, the fire will continue to burn until all the fuel is exhausted by the pool fire. It is not practical or even possible to extinguish large LNG pool fires resulting from large spills of LNG unless the flow of LNG feeding the pool can be stopped.

The maximum vapor cloud fire hazard area is typically estimated by calculating a downwind dispersion distance to the lower flammable limit (LFL) and a cross-wind dispersion distance to ½ LFL at low wind speed and stable atmospheric conditions. This maximum fire hazard zone is very unlikely to be experienced in any situation where the cloud drifts over populated areas. As indicated in point 3 above, the cloud will soon encounter an ignition source and burn back to the source well before the maximum hazard area is reached.


Featured Case Studies

Process Safety Management Quality Audits

Companies have implemented their process safety management programs to comply with OSHA and EPA requirements, but they continue to have accidents. Process safety management programs can meet the letter of the law, but may not be effective in preventing accidents. Traditional audit programs look at documentation and procedures, but do little to evaluate the program quality or effectiveness.

View Case Study
An LNG plant in the U.S. was planning the renovation and expansion of its existing facilities, as well as replacing and installing new pipelines for transmission and distribution. Before construction began, the client needed to be sure the potential risks were identified and successfully managed to prevent any release of LNG and damage to their existing equipment and storage tank. 
Read more...
A global energy infrastructure company, primarily engaged in liquified natural gas (LNG) related businesses and the leading producer of LNG in the U.S., requested an evaluation of the emergency depressurization (EDP) valves at its LNG facility. 
Read more...

The California Energy Commission was directed to assist in the development of clean alternate transportation fuels. As part of this effort, they support the commercialization of fuel cell vehicles operating on hydrogen fuel. In order to be used extensively in the transportation sector, the safety of hydrogen production, storage, and supply needed to be addressed.

Read more...

Featured Videos

Latest News

Want to Get the Latest News from ioMosaic?

Sign Up Now